The Carrier Paradigm

Donald Trump doesn’t have enough of an attention span to want to run the country on a day-to-day basis.  He wants to be:  (a) the center of attention; (b) popular; (c) in charge of all negotiations of any consequence; and (d) the man who makes all of the really important decisions.  Everything else can and will be delegated.

Carrier is a good example of what we can expect over the next four years:  a very public intervention in the economy which created lots of favorable headlines, but ultimately accomplished less than met the eye.

 

Lines on the Cyberbully-in-Chief

The Twitter King

“Our firm is still struggling” said the big CEO.

“We have to move lots of jobs to Mexico.”

“The wall’s a distraction, created by clowns.”

TWEET, went the Trumpster, and then he backed down.

 

“We care very deeply about workers’ rights.

If you try to erode them, you’re in for a fight.

Opponents of unions are ignorant slobs.”

TWEET, went the Trumpster, and he lost his job.

 

She’s really pissed off by the big oil spill.

Of corporate malfeasance she’s had quite her fill.

She’s called out the system as blind and corrupt.

TWEET, went the Trumpster, and she shut up.

 

A cop shot his cousin three times in the back.

He thinks that it happened because he was black.

He called on the President to take a side.

TWEET, went the Trumpster, and he had to hide.

 

Some call this bullying–some call it worse.

For four years it seems that we’re probably cursed.

You can do lots of harm with a casual tweet.

I just wish he’d learn to be much more discreet.

On Barack and Henry

I’m not old enough to hate Henry Kissinger.  His realism always seemed to me to be an island of sanity in a sea of imperial overstretch and misplaced idealism.  As a result, for me, his original sin was not Cambodia or Vietnam, but the Iraq War, for which his support was a clear violation of his principles.   Metternich would have known better.

There is an interview with Kissinger in the most recent edition of The Atlantic which largely focuses on Obama’s record with regard to China.  Kissinger gives Obama a B+ for his China policy, which seems fair to me, but he criticizes the President for lacking a long-term vision in the Far East, which does not.  It is reasonable to say that Obama’s approach to foreign affairs has been largely fact-driven and ad hoc, but his “pivot to Asia” was an exception to that.  He actually did have a long-term goal of creating a rules-driven economic and security framework in the Pacific which could either accommodate or thwart the rise of China, depending on the behavior of the Chinese.  The cornerstone of that approach was the TPP.

Now, with the election of Trump, this approach is in ruins.  More on that in a subsequent post.

 

 

 

The Strong Man and the System: The Judiciary

Given Trump’s authoritarian tendencies, it is virtually a given that he will attempt to stretch his legal powers to the maximum extent possible.  When that happens, the first line of defense will be the federal judiciary.

You can expect to see plenty of litigation filed in District Courts in blue states. Many of the judges in these areas will be Obama appointees, and Trump cannot fire them.  The outcomes will depend on the facts and the legal issues, of course, but in general, I would anticipate that Trump’s won/loss record won’t be very good.

How will the man on golf cart react to adverse court orders?  Will he obey or ignore them?  Based on his behavior relative to the judiciary to date, it’s hard to be very optimistic on this point.

A Bruce Hornsby Classic Updated for 2016

              The Way It Is

Hispanic guy stands with his tools in hand at the bus stop, man.

Praying that the axe won’t fall.

A redneck guy comes driving by; sees him there and sighs.

Just for fun he says, “Build the wall.”

 

That’s just the way it is.

Some things will never change.

That’s just the way it is.

Ah, but don’t you believe it.

 

I said, “Hey, old dude! Why the attitude?  What’s he done to you?”

He just stared at me and sneered.

Said “Ain’t you white?  Ain’t you seen the light?  Gonna make things right!”

Tried to understand his fears.

 

That’s just the way it is.

Some things will never change.

That’s just the way it is.

That’s just the way it is, it is, it is.

 

Parody of “The Way It Is” by Bruce Hornsby.

The Strong Man and the System: The States

The states can provide a check on the aspirations of the new GOP regime in the following ways:

1.  Medicaid:  Some red states agreed to the Medicaid expansion, including Mike Pence’s Indiana.  There will be resistance to a complete repeal of the expansion.

2.  Abortion restrictions:  Trump apparently believes that abortion should be left to the states after Roe is reversed, but it is doubtful that most Republican congressmen agree.  If Congress were in a position to completely ban abortion throughout the entire country, I don’t see how those regulations could effectively be enforced without a substantial amount of cooperation from the states.  In many states, it would not be forthcoming.

3.  Environmental regulations:  Blue states, particularly California, are in a position to adopt more stringent regulations than the federal government.  Car manufacturers in particular will have to adjust their standards accordingly. Don’t be surprised if federal preemption becomes a major issue during the next four years.

4.  Immigration enforcement:  Barring a huge increase in the size of the federal government, some state assistance will be necessary to facilitate mass deportations.   It won’t happen in California.

A Mea Culpa on “The Voice”

I  predicted three of the four finalists several weeks ago, and I picked the third and fourth place finishers correctly, but there were even more country voters out there than I thought.  As a result, the guy with the cowboy hat, the big beard, and the name that sounds like a brand of condom won even though he had another contestant in his lane.

Hey, what did you expect?  I underestimated the number of Trump voters, too. By and large, they’re the same people.

The Strong Man and the System: The Military

Contrary to the opinions held in some circles, military leaders tend to be very conservative about the use of force, because they understand the risks better than civilians.  In that sense, the concerns about the number of generals in the cabinet is unfounded.

While Flynn is a notable exception, you can expect the military, as a whole, to push back on torturing suspected terrorists, and they will object to establishing any kind of unholy alliance with Russia.  His comments during the campaign notwithstanding, Trump is likely to show some deference to the leadership, so there is some doubt that he will ultimately establish the kind of relationship with Putin that he so obviously desires.

A Limerick on the Cabinet

So the fox will stand guard on the hens.

The pigs slop themselves in the pen.

They’ll kick up the dust

But the joke is on us

It’s much worse than the Bush days again.

A Limerick on Rick Perry

The Energy Czar named Rick Perry.

Of his views we should be pretty wary.

He’s one of those fools

Who just loves fossil fuels.

And that, I must say, is quite scary.

 

On Trump and Tillerson

I have no reason to doubt that Tillerson is a really bright guy, and the fact that James Baker and Bob Gates vouch for him is at least somewhat reassuring.   I can’t remember another Secretary of State whose background was limited to business, however.  In conventional terms, this is a very unusual appointment.

From Trump’s perspective, however, it makes perfect sense;  Tillerson can help him renegotiate all of those terrible trade deals.  If he follows through with the expected Bolton appointment, his diplomatic and national security team will be a perfect mirror of his personality and ideology:  mercantilist; swaggering; militaristic; black and white; and obsessed with Islamic terrorists.

I will be very surprised if we aren’t at war with someone in 2017.  The only question is who;  that is TBD.

The Strong Man and the System: The House

There are actually three groupings in the House:  the Republicans; the Democrats; and the Freedom Caucus, which, during the Obama Administration, used extreme obstructionist tactics to promote a limited government agenda. The question today is whether the Freedom Caucus will accept swaggering government in lieu of limited government as long as Trump is President.  If so, the GOP agenda will move smoothly through the House;  if not, you could see the same kind of crises over the debt ceiling increase to which we have become accustomed over the last six years, and Ryan may need Democratic votes to keep the government open.

My guess is that the Freedom Caucus will be driven by the polls.  So long as Trump is perceived to be popular, swaggering will be the order of the day.  If he falls off the charts, obstructionism may return with a vengeance.

The Worst Job in America

After the 2008 election, The Onion memorably published an article with a headline that ran something like “Black Man Given Worst Job in America.”  Since the economy was collapsing at the time of the election, it looked like a fair assessment.

You can’t say that commuting between the White House and Versailles-in-the-Sky during a time of relative peace and prosperity is a bad gig.  No, the worst job in America in 2017 is to be Trump’s Secretary of State.  You will have to run around the world putting the best face possible on Trump’s militarism and neo-mercantilism, while being undercut repeatedly by contradictory messages from the boss.

Good luck, Mr. Tillerson:  you’re going to need it.  More on his appointment later today.

The Predictably Unpredictable President

Trump apparently told Fox News yesterday that he would consider using the One China policy as a bargaining chip in broader negotiations with the Chinese.  This was an incredibly stupid comment, for the following reasons:

  1.  It’s offensive, and hardly reassuring, for the Taiwanese to be told they are a bargaining chip in a bigger picture.
  2.  The Chinese government doesn’t negotiate over issues of sovereignty.
  3.  Telling the world how you plan to negotiate makes it easier for the other side to anticipate your next move.

Trump has actually written books in which he laid out his approach to negotiations.  You can be sure the Chinese have read them, and consequently know not to take his more extreme statements too seriously.  As a result, he may well have to follow through with the madman act in order to get anything accomplished, which is pretty scary.