Month: December 2016

              The Way It Is

Hispanic guy stands with his tools in hand at the bus stop, man.

Praying that the axe won’t fall.

A redneck guy comes driving by; sees him there and sighs.

Just for fun he says, “Build the wall.”

 

That’s just the way it is.

Some things will never change.

That’s just the way it is.

Ah, but don’t you believe it.

 

I said, “Hey, old dude! Why the attitude?  What’s he done to you?”

He just stared at me and sneered.

Said “Ain’t you white?  Ain’t you seen the light?  Gonna make things right!”

Tried to understand his fears.

 

That’s just the way it is.

Some things will never change.

That’s just the way it is.

That’s just the way it is, it is, it is.

 

Parody of “The Way It Is” by Bruce Hornsby.

The states can provide a check on the aspirations of the new GOP regime in the following ways:

1.  Medicaid:  Some red states agreed to the Medicaid expansion, including Mike Pence’s Indiana.  There will be resistance to a complete repeal of the expansion.

2.  Abortion restrictions:  Trump apparently believes that abortion should be left to the states after Roe is reversed, but it is doubtful that most Republican congressmen agree.  If Congress were in a position to completely ban abortion throughout the entire country, I don’t see how those regulations could effectively be enforced without a substantial amount of cooperation from the states.  In many states, it would not be forthcoming.

3.  Environmental regulations:  Blue states, particularly California, are in a position to adopt more stringent regulations than the federal government.  Car manufacturers in particular will have to adjust their standards accordingly. Don’t be surprised if federal preemption becomes a major issue during the next four years.

4.  Immigration enforcement:  Barring a huge increase in the size of the federal government, some state assistance will be necessary to facilitate mass deportations.   It won’t happen in California.

I  predicted three of the four finalists several weeks ago, and I picked the third and fourth place finishers correctly, but there were even more country voters out there than I thought.  As a result, the guy with the cowboy hat, the big beard, and the name that sounds like a brand of condom won even though he had another contestant in his lane.

Hey, what did you expect?  I underestimated the number of Trump voters, too. By and large, they’re the same people.

Contrary to the opinions held in some circles, military leaders tend to be very conservative about the use of force, because they understand the risks better than civilians.  In that sense, the concerns about the number of generals in the cabinet is unfounded.

While Flynn is a notable exception, you can expect the military, as a whole, to push back on torturing suspected terrorists, and they will object to establishing any kind of unholy alliance with Russia.  His comments during the campaign notwithstanding, Trump is likely to show some deference to the leadership, so there is some doubt that he will ultimately establish the kind of relationship with Putin that he so obviously desires.

I speak of the man known as Rex.

Employees call him “Sir” and not “Tex.”

He’s made so much money

It’s not even funny

But power can trump even sex.

So the fox will stand guard on the hens.

The pigs slop themselves in the pen.

They’ll kick up the dust

But the joke is on us

It’s much worse than the Bush days again.

The Energy Czar named Rick Perry.

Of his views we should be pretty wary.

He’s one of those fools

Who just loves fossil fuels.

And that, I must say, is quite scary.

 

I have no reason to doubt that Tillerson is a really bright guy, and the fact that James Baker and Bob Gates vouch for him is at least somewhat reassuring.   I can’t remember another Secretary of State whose background was limited to business, however.  In conventional terms, this is a very unusual appointment.

From Trump’s perspective, however, it makes perfect sense;  Tillerson can help him renegotiate all of those terrible trade deals.  If he follows through with the expected Bolton appointment, his diplomatic and national security team will be a perfect mirror of his personality and ideology:  mercantilist; swaggering; militaristic; black and white; and obsessed with Islamic terrorists.

I will be very surprised if we aren’t at war with someone in 2017.  The only question is who;  that is TBD.

There are actually three groupings in the House:  the Republicans; the Democrats; and the Freedom Caucus, which, during the Obama Administration, used extreme obstructionist tactics to promote a limited government agenda. The question today is whether the Freedom Caucus will accept swaggering government in lieu of limited government as long as Trump is President.  If so, the GOP agenda will move smoothly through the House;  if not, you could see the same kind of crises over the debt ceiling increase to which we have become accustomed over the last six years, and Ryan may need Democratic votes to keep the government open.

My guess is that the Freedom Caucus will be driven by the polls.  So long as Trump is perceived to be popular, swaggering will be the order of the day.  If he falls off the charts, obstructionism may return with a vengeance.

After the 2008 election, The Onion memorably published an article with a headline that ran something like “Black Man Given Worst Job in America.”  Since the economy was collapsing at the time of the election, it looked like a fair assessment.

You can’t say that commuting between the White House and Versailles-in-the-Sky during a time of relative peace and prosperity is a bad gig.  No, the worst job in America in 2017 is to be Trump’s Secretary of State.  You will have to run around the world putting the best face possible on Trump’s militarism and neo-mercantilism, while being undercut repeatedly by contradictory messages from the boss.

Good luck, Mr. Tillerson:  you’re going to need it.  More on his appointment later today.

Trump apparently told Fox News yesterday that he would consider using the One China policy as a bargaining chip in broader negotiations with the Chinese.  This was an incredibly stupid comment, for the following reasons:

1.  It’s offensive, and hardly reassuring, for the Taiwanese to be told they are a bargaining chip in a bigger picture.
2.  The Chinese government doesn’t negotiate over issues of sovereignty.
3.  Telling the world how you plan to negotiate makes it easier for the other side to anticipate your next move.

Trump has actually written books in which he laid out his approach to negotiations.  You can be sure the Chinese have read them, and consequently know not to take his more extreme statements too seriously.  As a result, he may well have to follow through with the madman act in order to get anything accomplished, which is pretty scary.

On paper, the Senate will be one of the biggest roadblocks to the Trump agenda. Here is how it will play out in the real world:

1.  Confirming appointments:  In all likelihood, all of Trump’s cabinet appointments will squeak through, since there is a natural desire to let the President rule through men of his choosing.  The Democrats will have a field day attacking the many fox in the henhouse selections, and a few of the Republicans (McCain, Graham, Paul) will express concerns about Trump’s foreign policy team and their feelings about Putin.  On the whole, however, the storms will blow over.

2.  Ratifying treaties:  There won’t be any.  Trump will rely solely on his executive powers to deal with foreign governments.

3.  Legislation:  Mitch McConnell tends to take the long view, so don’t expect dramatic changes in the filibuster.  Obamacare repeal will turn into a fiasco.  The tax cut will pass through reconciliation, but the GOP won’t have the votes to jam much legislation through the system.  Like Obama, Trump will deal with this issue through executive action, which for some reason will no longer be called “caesarism” by the Republican leadership.

 

They make an odd couple, Donald Trump and Paul Ryan:  the swaggering narcissist with no agenda but his ego and the priggish Eagle Scout who would sell his mother for a huge regressive tax cut.  You have to believe they despise each other.  For now, they will get along, because Ryan has made it clear that he will say and do anything to advance his reverse Robin Hood agenda.  But what happens when it’s done? What will Ryan say then?

My guess is that Trump will deal with this problem by stringing Ryan along on entitlement cuts.  The issue will never come up as long as Ryan still has unfulfilled hopes on Social Security and Medicare “reform.”

I observed months ago that Dick Cheney and Donald Trump were similar in that the lives of both revolved around two things:  making money and kicking butt. Of course,  that would be true of the GOP–the daddy party–as a whole.

The Trump cabinet basically consists of two kinds of people:  generals and billionaires.  QED.

WTF?

Today it’s a wall, but tomorrow a fence.

His method’s to keep us in wide-eyed suspense.

If you’ve figured it out, then you must be in luck.

WTF?

 

A brand new appointment to balance the last.

A picture book future to blot out the past.

A road has been opened, but the bus is still stuck.

WTF?

 

China is up, but next week it’s Taiwan.

The chaos is coming; stability’s gone.

If you don’t understand this, you’re dead as a duck.

WTF?

 

The coaster is rolling; the funhouse awaits.

The world’s not convinced this is making us great.

In my eyes, it’s more like America sucks.

WTF?

 

Questions abound; no one knows what to do.

It’s hard to determine what’s false and what’s true.

Would someone please pull us all out of the muck?

WTF?