Category: Uncategorized

Pruitt made the moral and legal connection between unprincipled deregulation and grifting clear to everyone.   Now he’s gone, and Trump will undoubtedly replace him with a blander version of the same thing.  That’s not much of an improvement.

The GOP is divided on virtually everything except tax cuts and the Supreme Court, so it is no surprise that Hamilton gets mixed reviews, as well:

CLs:  Ugh!  We hate big government!  Jefferson rocks!

PBPs:  Yeah, baby!  The patron saint of American capitalism!

Reactionaries:  We don’t like the immigrant part, but at least he made America great with his focus on economic and military power.

CDs:  Not keen on his personal morality, but we approve of his stance on slavery.

CLs:  The Revolution was about freedom from big, oppressive government.

PBPs:  It’s about capitalism and the biggest economy on the planet.  Damn right we’re proud of it.

CDs:  Freedom from established religion.

Reactionaries:  God, guns, and guts made America free.  We celebrate military victories, Christianity, and good old-fashioned Anglo-Saxon culture.  Down with foreigners!

Would You Sell Your Soul For A Tax Cut?

Would you sell your soul for a tax cut?

If you’re Ryan, you certainly would.

Help the rich when you can.

Cause you follow Ayn Rand.

You would do it again if you could.

 

Would you sell your soul for Neil Gorsuch?

For McConnell, it wasn’t in doubt.

Cause Gorsuch unites

Every part of the right

And he kept a big liberal out.

 

Would you trade your soul for your ego?

For Trump, that’s barely a choice.

The one is so small

You can’t see it at all

While the other’s as loud as his voice.

The laundry list of grievances in the Declaration notwithstanding, the American colonists were hardly an oppressed people in the 1770s.  The Revolution came about primarily because the colonists started thinking of themselves as a nation apart from the UK, not because their lives were so miserable.

I think the First Continental Congress was a vastly underappreciated turning point in the conflict.  It would have been the easiest thing in the world for the other colonies to leave Massachusetts holding the bag after the Boston Tea Party, but they didn’t, because, in spite of their cultural and economic differences, they saw the people of Massachusetts as fellow travelers.

Food for thought on July 4, 2018.

Putin is basically a cold-blooded gangster, so it makes sense to apply the Johnny Rocco question to him.  Here is what he could ask of Trump:

1.  Withdraw from, and destroy, NATO;
2.  Withdraw from Syria;
3.  Drop sanctions and offer a free hand in Ukraine; and
4.  Change course on the American military buildup.

Trump can’t do all of this on his own, but he will probably do what he can on the first three.  And what can Putin offer in exchange?  A free hand with Iran?  Help with the election???

Any deal they can make will be awful.

If you believe Steve Bannon, western populist leaders will unite to support their common interests and values.

Right.

Here is what will really happen:  AMLO won’t be able to deliver on his promises, the Mexican markets and the peso will tank, and AMLO will use Trump as a convenient whipping boy.  US/Mexican relations will deteriorate dramatically.

Sounds great, doesn’t it?

On the 45th president Trump.

Which deal is the next to be dumped?

The WTO

Is a good bet to go

’Cause it makes him a terrible grump.

 

On the 45th president Don.

All semblance of reason is gone.

He’s meeting with Vlad.

All the omens are bad,

’Cause on dictators he loves to fawn.

I will be on vacation starting tomorrow.  Regular postings will resume on 7/9.

Well, of course Trump wants to meet with Putin.  He obviously admires the man and enjoys his company.  Who wouldn’t rather hang out with the bad boy of Europe than with Merkel the schoolmarm?

Since Trump has endless belief in his ability to get things done with his bottomless negotiating skills and endless charm, there is no line for him between business and personal.  Actually knowing what he is talking about is far less important than what is in his golden gut.

Somehow, I don’t think Putin sees the world the same way.

As the story goes, Stalin was told by Churchill that a German invasion was imminent in 1940, but he refused to take any action to prepare for it, because if there was one leader he could trust, it was his fellow dictator–not some weenie democratic head of state.  This sort of reminds me of that episode.

It’s a given that our new Supreme Court justice is going to be a vote to reduce abortion rights.  It may be done in one fell swoop or brick-by-brick, but it’s going to happen.  The public and the Democratic Party need to be prepared to deal with that on a state-by-state basis.

What’s effectively up in the air, and probably more important, is whether the new justice will be a principled conservative with a healthy respect for traditional liberties, or a stooge for Trump and his complete lack of respect for traditional liberties.  In my opinion, the most critical question the Senate can ask the nominee will be about the Trump v. Hawaii case, and in particular, about Kennedy’s pathetic concurring opinion.

Historically, professional football has been a predominantly red sport.  Trump nonetheless decided to attack the NFL and make it part of the culture wars for his own purposes.  He succeeded;  red America followed him, and ratings dropped.

Harley-Davidson is, as Trump has said, an American icon, particularly among red Americans.  As a result of Trump’s tariffs and EU retaliation, they have decided to move some production overseas.  Trump, naturally, has complained about the company’s lack of patience and loyalty in his tweets, and H-D’s stock price has fallen.  Will red America follow him again and refuse to buy H-D motorcycles?  That would be a tough sell, but if what happened to the NFL is any guide, it could happen.

What’s next?  Will he go after American pig farmers for complaining about tariffs and Chinese retaliation?  At least they can’t move their production out of the country.

Every student of revolutionary politics learns early on that one of the principal tasks of the revolutionaries is to force the vast number of people who prefer to sit on the sidelines to take sides.  This is frequently done by doing outrageous things and provoking a disproportionate response from the establishment.

Does this sound familiar?  That’s the way Trump does business on a daily basis.

 

 

Borderline

Something ’bout those refugees drives my supporters nuts.

So I have to keep them in your country, no matter what.

Stop playing with our hearts.

I’ll finish what you start

When we finally build the wall.

If you want to pick a fight

I’ll be here to say goodnight.

I really don’t fear you at all.

 

Just try to understand.

I’ve given all I can.

You can’t get the best of me.

 

Borderline.

Some say I’ve already lost my mind.

You just keep on pushing rapists over the borderline.

(Repeat)

 

Parody of “Borderline” by Madonna.

As I predicted a long time ago, the Supreme Court overturned the lower court decisions and upheld the travel ban in Trump v. Hawaii.  In doing so, the Court chose to essentially prioritize the president’s powers in matters of national security over rights created by the Establishment Clause.

The case revolved around Trump’s public statements about a Muslim ban.  Justices Roberts and Kennedy made oblique, and ultimately ineffectual, efforts to show that they were still on the side of the angels;  the majority opinion overrules Korematsu, while Kennedy made some strained and almost pathetic comments about how incredibly important it is for public officials to follow the Constitution even when there is no judicial check on them.  The message is “We may have concerns about Trump, but we’re not part of the resistance–you’re on your own with that.”

I was watching a PBS program about America in World War I last night.  Part of the program, naturally, was about the Sedition Act and the other measures that were used to crack down on dissent during the war.  Naturally, the question arises:  what happens if Trump manufactures a foreign policy crisis and then demands limits on our civil liberties in the name of national security?  Can we rely on the Court to protect us, or will the justices simply wring their hands and do nothing, like Ryan and McConnell?

After yesterday, the answer is fairly clear.  And don’t think for a minute that it can’t happen here, because it has before.