There once was a pontiff named Francis
Who took pro-environment stances.
While he drew a large crowd
And the public was wowed
On his doctrine, I don’t like his chances.
Republicans are getting the day off. They will be back tomorrow.
There once was a pontiff named Francis
Who took pro-environment stances.
While he drew a large crowd
And the public was wowed
On his doctrine, I don’t like his chances.
Republicans are getting the day off. They will be back tomorrow.
“I’m a scientist, man.”
The candidates named Ted and Mike
Make statements that centrists don’t like.
Their views are extreme
They’re as bad as they seem
They make you stand up and say “yikes!”
To their proposed wars with the Supreme Court and Iran, America politely says “No thanks.”
It wasn’t supposed to be this way.
Jeb! clearly agonized over his decision to run, because he knew that everything about his candidacy would infuriate the Reactionaries, and he would pay a heavy price for it. In the long run, however, he believed that his establishment connections would make him the undisputed leader of the Romney Coalition, and that the GOP was insufficiently suicidal to nominate a Reactionary. He would, therefore, lose some battles along the way, but he would win the war, just as Romney did, and the Reactionaries would fall in line in order to defeat Hillary.
Two things have happened to upset these calculations:
If Jeb! were any other candidate, his donors would already be scurrying off to Rubio, and the chasm of irrelevance would loom ahead. Since he already has a huge amount of money in the bank, however, he can go on indefinitely.
As I see it, his options are as follows:
The bottom line is that Rubio and Trump are to his campaign what Assad and ISIS are to American policy in Syria–the trick is to avoid helping one by destroying the other. Can he thread the needle? Based on what we have seen so far, you would have to say no.
Trump promises to make America great again. My question is, when does he believe America was last great?
Was it:
During the George W. Bush administration? Considering his opposition to the Iraq war and the presence of Jeb! in the race, certainly not.
During the Clinton administration? You can make a really good argument that the late 1990’s were a golden age for our country. The Soviet Union had imploded, China was not yet a problem, the Middle East was reasonably quiet, and the economy was growing very rapidly. At the time, however, everyone was fixated on the scandal du jour and missed the big picture. In any event, it would hardly do for Trump to say that America was last great when the husband of the likely Democratic nominee was president.
During the George H.W. Bush administration? More problems with Jeb!’s candidacy, plus a big recession and “read my lips.” No chance.
During the Reagan administration? Trump doesn’t talk about Reagan as much as, say, Ted Cruz, but that would be my guess. If so, America has been less than great for at least the last 27 years. Where has he been all this time? Why did he wait so long to save us from mediocrity?
Mourning the loss of Yogi Berra, an American treasure.
Pope Francis is, or at least should be, the intellectual leader of the Christian Democratic faction of the GOP. Will they listen to him on issues like climate change and immigration? Probably not, for two reasons:
I was preparing a post for today on the Evil Eagle Scout’s propensity for inept pandering to the various GOP factions (to be entitled “Why Scott Walker is a Wimp”) when he decided to ride his Harley into the sunset, to the dismay of none but the Koch brothers.
My initial assessment of his candidacy was that he was a one-trick pony with no charisma. The initial Iowa polling made me question my judgment temporarily, but it ultimately proved to be correct. Making union-bashing the focal point of his campaign, when the GOP needs plenty of union member votes to win, never made any sense.
He now assumes the 2012 role of Tim Pawlenty–the blandly obnoxious governor whose campaign peaked way too early and ended before the primaries began. So long, Scott. You won’t be missed.
The idea that a winning GOP coalition could be constructed from Conservative Libertarians and disaffected Independents and Democrats was never very plausible. When issues involving surveillance were center stage in 2014, however, it appeared that, just perhaps, Rand Paul’s moment had finally come. Then IS started beheading people, the GOP returned to its roots as the party that kicks butt overseas, and the dream faded away.
Paul is stuck in his father’s electoral ghetto. His ceiling is around 10 percent, and my guess is that he knows it. His campaign will be about gaining converts, not winning.
The longsuffering people of Greece
Thought austerity would finally cease.
But cutting their debt
Left the Germans upset
So their taxes and fees still increase.
Meet the new boss.
Same as the old boss.
They didn’t want to miss a new episode of “Empire.”
A comparison of the two:
Francis v. Xi
Leader of > 1 Billion Yes Yes
Selected in Secret Yes Yes
Corruption Fighter Yes Yes
Critical of West Yes Yes
Universal Values Yes Only on Paper
And the winner is. . .Francis, who actually believes in the universal values he espouses. Chinese exceptionalism isn’t a big seller here.
And, of course, the most important:
5. Given your checkered past as a CEO, and given further that you have no experience in government (to use your own language, losing a Senate race is an “activity,” not an “accomplishment”), why would anyone think you are qualified to be President of the United States?
We may be stupid, but we’re strong.