Three things:
- Social stability (i.e., no public unrest or challenges to his leadership);
- A dynamic economy; and
- Reduced inequality.
The problem is that he can’t have all three. #2 requires a blast of capitalism, which inevitably involves creative destruction and increased inequality, which is inconsistent with the other two objectives.
What does this mean in practice? #1 is the only goal that isn’t negotiable. It will prevail over the other two, which essentially means no change to the status quo unless or until the demands from the public become too strong to ignore.