Category: Uncategorized

I don’t know about you, but I’m tired of being pushed around by Canadians.  Just because they have a cool flag, and funny comedians, and a great hockey team, they think they have the right to tell the world what to do.  In light of their history, it’s not surprising;  after all, they invaded our country and burned the White House in 1814.

And so, I’m glad our president, as always, stood up for the cause of truth and called out Justin Trudeau for being the lying, bullying bastard that he really is.

Or not.

During the 2016 campaign, many of the GOP candidates made strong (and completely warranted) statements about Trump’s unfitness for office.  After the primaries were over, however, they closed ranks around him, because they were afraid of retaliation, and wanted to be re-elected.

Trump’s tariffs strike at the heart of conventional GOP ideology, and damage the economic interests of GOP-leaning businessmen.  GOP leaders have responded, not by trying to restrain Trump, but with mild statements of disapproval, because they are afraid of retaliation, and want to be re-elected.

In light of this, what do you think is going to happen if Trump starts a war and begins a clampdown on our civil rights?  Do you think the GOP leaders will stand firm in support of the Constitution, or will they acquiesce, because they are afraid of retaliation, and want to be re-elected?

It’s June, 2019. Tired of having to go abroad and listen to lectures from the other G7 leaders, Trump has decided to skip the G7 and host a bash with his fellow strongmen, which has been dubbed the “S6.”  The meeting is at his hotel, because, well, making money off his own party regardless of ethics rules is what a proper strongman would do.

The guests are arriving.  Duterte is the first to make an appearance.

T:  Rodrigo, you old son-of-a-bitch!

D:  Trump, you son-of-a-whore!  Good to see you!

T:  Don’t pay any attention to those demonstrators out there.  Real Americans love you.  They love a man who gets things done.

D:  Absolutely.  Look at my poll ratings.  Shooting drug dealers without trial has done wonders for me politically.

T:  Yeah, I wish I could do something like that here.

D:  Why don’t you try it?  If I can do it, you can.

T:  It’s just not so easy here.  Sessions will go along with separating immigrant families at the border and trying to repeal Obamacare through the judicial system, but he won’t let me do that.

D:  Just tell him what to do, and if he doesn’t do it, fire him.  That’s what a real strongman does.  He sees Xi entering the room.  Excuse me–I need to talk to Xi about a deal.

T:  Why not just make it with me?

D:  The Chinese are more reliable than you are.  No offense.  He wanders off to talk to Xi.  Putin enters the room.

T:  Vladimir, good to see you!  I’ve been taking a lot of abuse for you, you know.

P:  Well, I sympathize, but you haven’t given me proper credit for winning the election for you.  How’s the investigation going?

T:  Fake news!  Fake news!

P:  Why don’t you just shut it down?

T:  People would assume I’m guilty of something if I did.  I’d get killed politically.

P:  Who cares?  A proper strongman would never put up with that crap.  You need to shut down the press and take care of Mueller.  I can help you with some poison if you want.

T:  It’s just not that easy here.

P:  Donald, I keep telling you, you need to stop whining about how hard it is to be a real strongman.  Just do it!  Show some balls!  It’s the only way you’ll get any respect.

Erdogan has arrived.

T:  Hey, there’s Erdogan!  Have you met my friend Vlad?

E:  Of course.  We’re fighting each other in Syria.  I shot down one of his planes.

P:  Thanks for reminding me.

T:  Would you like a drink?  I don’t give anything for free at my hotels, but it’s happy hour.

E:  I’m a good Muslim.  I don’t drink.

T:  Oh, that’s right.  The dirty religion.  Well, you’re a strongman, so you’re still OK in my book.

The final guest has arrived.

ALL, IN UNISON:  Kim!  They sound like they’re greeting Norm at Cheers.

T:  Glad you could make it!  How’s the fake denuclearization program going?

K:  It’s brilliant!  Western reporters will believe anything if you show them a few pictures.

T:  No proper strongman would give up his nukes.  I understood that from the beginning.  No one else did.

K:  And you got a Nobel Peace Prize for it.  It was great.

T:  Frankly, Moon is a pain in my butt.  If you lobbed a few nukes at him, that would be OK with me.

K:  I’ll think about it.

T:  OK, listen up, everybody!  Are you having a good time?

P:  Absolutely.  It’s a hell of a lot better than listening to that bitch Merkel talk crap about human rights.

T:  I’ve got some special entertainment lined up for us.  First, we have front row seats for a WWE event.  There’s nothing like professional wrestling to remind you that rules are for losers, and power is the only thing that matters.

X:  What else?

T:  I still have some connections at the Miss Universe pageant.  Everyone is invited to go backstage!  To the winners, go the spoils!

E:  You’ll have to count me out on that one unless they’re wearing burqas.

T:  Everyone else on board?  Let’s go!  They leave.

On the EPA head known as Scott.

On his record, there’s more than one blot.

If you want to ask me

We should all be Scott-free.

His survival’s more likely than not.

 

Given that Trump knows little about nuclear weapons and less about Korean history, and has no apparent inclination to learn anything between now and June 12, it is impossible to believe that he will leave Singapore with a good deal with Kim.  That leaves two alternatives:  a bad deal; or none at all.

What would that mean?

A bad deal would take one of two forms:  either a vague concept of phased arms and sanctions reduction, with the details to be filled in later; or a detailed version of the same thing.  The first could easily morph, over time, into no deal, given Bolton’s opposition to a diplomatic solution and North Korea’s record of ultimately walking away from phased agreements.  In either event, the world would lose its appetite for enforcing sanctions, and Kim will wind up regaining his economic and diplomatic contacts without losing all of his nuclear program.

No deal could mean either an agreement just to meet again, or an acrimonious split.  Either way, enforcement of sanctions will be weakened, and Trump will be faced with the stark choice of either containment or war.

In short, unless you’re rooting for Trump to win a Nobel Prize, don’t get your hopes too high.  On the other hand, it would be kind of fun to watch Trump and the GOP twist themselves into a pretzel defending an agreement which provides fewer protections than the Iran deal that they just trashed.

Trump reportedly doesn’t really want to go to Canada today, and doesn’t plan to stay for the whole affair.  You can understand why.  He won’t be able to stay at one of his hotels, it will cut into “Executive Time,” and everyone is going to give him boring lectures about democracy and free trade.  Hanging out with Kim and Dennis Rodman, let alone Putin or Xi, is a lot more fun than that.

Will he confront the G6 directly, or will he be his usual passive-aggressive self and wait until he comes home?  Will this be the end of the annual summits, at least for now?  For an alternative scenario, watch for tomorrow’s post.

Hamilton, the economic nationalist, and Jefferson, the small government democrat, are the yin and yang of American political history.  Then and now, they combine about as well as oil and water.  And yet, the Trump GOP features both.

The CLs are pure Jeffersonians.  Minus their support for social programs that help deserving white people, the Reactionaries, with their loathing of urban culture and support for states’ rights, are as well.  Trump, on the other hand, sounds like a caricature of Hamilton at times, with his tariffs, his love of military splendor, and his “America First” bluster.  No wonder the party struggles to get anything done!

If the GOP is both Hamilton and Jefferson, who are the Democrats?  Mostly, the people who were left out by both of them–minorities and women.

Issues and attitudes change, but there can be no doubt about it–Calvin Coolidge was a CL.  Personally austere, he was determined to keep the size of the federal government as small as possible.  He presided over a lopsided boom, and missed the Great Depression.  It is fortunate for his reputation, and for the country, that he did.

Hoover, on the other hand, was a PBP.  He was willing to use the power of the federal government to boost the economy even before the Great Depression.   In the final analysis, however, he was overwhelmed by the magnitude of the task before him, and he was unwilling to take the steps that were necessary to generate a real recovery, because he thought the cure ultimately was worse than the disease.  As history shows us, he was wrong;  FDR changed the country in innumerable ways, but he didn’t destroy it as a liberal democracy.

Hoover reminds me of Lord John Russell during the Potato Famine:  an intelligent and decent man who was constrained by limited government ideology from doing what needed to be done to respond to a disaster of unimaginable proportions.

After reading the articles about the Masterpiece oral argument, I was fairly convinced that the outcome would be a narrow decision for the baker, probably focused on some absurd distinction between bakers and other merchants.  That didn’t happen.  Instead, we got an even more narrow decision based on indiscreet comments made by various members of the Colorado reviewing panel that has no meaningful precedential value.  That was no accident.

The clear message from Justice Kennedy is that gay rights are worthy of protection, but that gay triumphalism won’t be rewarded, and that both sides need to be more tolerant of each other.  He believes the issue will become less contentious with time, and that the better course today is to avoid throwing gas on the fire.  Frankly, I agree with him.

One other benefit of the decision–it will have an impact on the travel ban case, as the Court will now have a more difficult time explaining away the significance of Trump’s tweets.

Bret Stephens says Trump is now officially the worst GOP president ever–worse than Herbert Hoover.  Is he right?  Here’s how the two titans stack up:

                                                Hoover     vs.       Trump

Party                                      GOP                        GOP

Successful Businessman    Yes                          Arguable

Accomplishment                 Famine Relief        Trump Tower

Gov’t Experience                 Yes                            No

Faced Crisis                          Yes                            Not Yet

Corrupt                                 No                              Yes

Second Term                       No                                ???

And the winner is . . . Hoover, by a landslide.  Unlike Trump, he was clean and competent.  More on him and the GOP tomorrow.

Deport illegal aliens.  Stop sanctuary cities.  Drain the swamp.

Those are the predominant themes in the campaign ads in South Carolina, where there are no sanctuary cities and very few illegal aliens, and where the swamp is colored bright red.

Can’t these people come up with something a bit more original?

The line on what is acceptable and what isn’t on TV is, admittedly, moving fairly rapidly, but there are still a few words that are entirely too vulgar to be used to describe anyone, and she used one of them.  The problem wasn’t her vehemence; it was simply bad taste.  That makes her case different than Roseanne’s; racism isn’t tasteless–it’s evil.

And why bother linking Ivanka to her dad’s views on immigration?  If you want to complain about, say, her business dealings, fine, but does anyone believe she could change his position on dealing with “animals?”  I just don’t see it.  Save your ammunition for issues on which Ivanka really could make a difference if she tried harder.

I will be on vacation for the next few days.  Postings will resume late Wednesday.

There is support in both political parties and in Europe for a stronger stance on trade issues with China.  In the face of that, Trump imposes tariffs on . . . steel and aluminum from Canada, Mexico, and the EU!

It only makes sense if you understand that Trump believes the following:

1.  Values do not matter in international relations–only interests do;
2.  Trade deficits are the scorecard by which international relationships are judged;
3.  Our so-called allies are among the worst offenders, and are no better than China; and
4.  Our financial and market power are so strong, we can bring the rest of the world to heel simply by playing hardball.

In the entire country, you can probably count the number of other people who believe these things on your hands.  They’re the ones making the decisions, however.

This is going to do enormous damage to our country.  By the time Trump leaves office, Israel and Saudi Arabia will be our only allies.  Obama wanted to encircle China;  after NAFTA collapses and Mexico and Canada turn on us, we will be the nation encircled by hostile nations.

 

My wife is on Facebook, but I’m not, and never will be, for the following reasons:

1.  No one outside my family has any reason to take any interest in the details of my life;
2.  While the use of the internet inevitably leads to some loss of privacy, Facebook takes that to a whole new level;
3.  Facebook’s business model requires them to sell information you would ordinarily think is confidential for a profit, which means that any reforms on their part can only be nibbling around the edges; and
4.  The “like” feature encourages unhealthy competition and imposes conformity within groups, both of which can lead to depression, particularly among teenagers.

The power of social media by the government to enforce both legal and informal norms has barely been explored, but you have to believe it will happen.  Imagine that you live in China and Xi is on a Chinese service similar to Facebook.  Wouldn’t you be afraid not to be his friend?  Wouldn’t you be afraid not to be on record liking his postings?

1984 is on the horizon, but I don’t plan to be a part of it.

Political correctness is commonly understood as an unwarranted hypersensitivity to slights tied to race, appearance, religion, or sexual orientation.  To many Reactionaries, however, it really means that the left refuses to accept and debate the “fact” that ethnic and religious minorities are a grave threat to the well-being of the country.

Of course, their use of the term “political correctness” in place of overtly racist words is an implicit concession that public displays of racism are unacceptable.  It is, therefore, itself a manifestation of PC.